* KBZ-Logo-7.png


KBzine: the original kitchen and bathroom industry e-newssince 2002
28th January 2021


We strongly recommend viewing KBzine full size in your web browser. Click our masthead above to visit our website version.


English French Spanish Italian German Dutch Russian Mandarin

Kitchen manufacturer fined after worker's hand was caught in machinery

Northampton luxury kitchen manufacturer, Bespoke in Oak, was sentenced on Tuesday after a worker had two fingers amputated following an industrial accident. The incident occurred in October 2014 when the worker caught his dominant right hand on a revolving cutting block.

Northampton Magistrates' Court heard that the cutting block provided was not suitable for use in manual mode on a single-end toning machine. The machine was not guarded correctly and there was access to dangerous moving parts. Also the company had failed to adequately train the worker or supervise him sufficiently to use the woodworking machine.

Neither he nor his supervisor recognised that the working method was unsafe.

Limited cutter projection tooling is a requirement for hand-fed woodworking machines as it significantly reduces the severity of injury if a machine operator's fingers contact the rotating tool. This type of tooling has been a requirement on hand-fed machines since 2003.

Following the accident, the company was able to improve the guarding of the machine by making a guard from wood using the skills within the company.

Bespoke in Oak, of East Haddon Hill, East Haddon, Northampton, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulations 4(1), 11(1), 9(1) and 9(2) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) and was fined £40,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £1,896. After the hearing, Inspector Neil Ward said: "This case involved an entirely avoidable accident. The worker's fingers were so badly injured that surgeons had to amputate. The worker was unable to work for three months and more than a year after the accident, he is still unable to do any heavy work. The defendant company fell far short of a safe and reasonable standard in its duties under health and safety legislation." 

More about the legislation referred to in this case can be found at: www.legislation.gov.uk

15th January 2016

© The KBzine 2024.
Subscribe | Unsubscribe | Hall of Fame | Cookies | Sitemap